Hi Brett, great job -- but I would like to plead for the life of the sched module. I love sched and use it often for purposes for which it seems to me that the proposed replacement strategy (via threading.Timer) is not suitable: for example when I'm on a platform without threads (and don't need threads, nor care about them -- I just want events executed serially at specific times), or for simulation purposes (more often than not, I'm passing something other than time.time and time.sleep as the scheduler's callbacks).
Alex _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
