On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, I have been planning implementing that exact function at some > > point as part of my "let's get Python's testing tool support up to > > snuff" project (which, of course, will happen between now and when I > > fall over dead). I honestly didn't know about the patch plus I don't > > have the time to go through and change every import for every module > > such that the module being tested is optional (and thus skipped), but > > that if the support modules are missing the test fails. > > It looks like the patch already changes tests, which have optional imports. >
Right, but that is not the extend I was thinking for "optional". I personally want to see it so that if the module being tested is not present, the test is skipped, otherwise failing imports means there is a test error. The patch only covers like five modules (most of which are being removed) which have modules that are optional for some tests. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
