On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:03 PM, David Bolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Brett Cannon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Also realize all of the right people have been consulted on this stuff > > (e.g., the web SIG about the urllib package). So please do not think > > that something that seems drastic (e.g., the removal of all > > Mac-specific modules) was taken lightly when in fact the proper people > > were asked and they were okay with what is going on. > > Are there any thoughts on providing some other distribution or mechanism > to build selected Mac modules post-removal? Is it likely to be possible > to grab current 2.x source and build as part of 3.x, providing it's not > a 64-bit system or UCS-4 configuration unsupported by bgen? > > I have an application using the QuickTime portion of the Carbon package > very successfully in recent code (with a primarily Tiger-based user > base), where the higher level Cocoa/ObjC frameworks didn't provide the > necessary functionality under Tiger - it would be nice to have some path > to maintaining that across a 2.x/3.x transition, even if I had to build > something locally. >
Even when the code is removed it will still be in the svn history so you should be able to grab it easily. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
