On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:31:17PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Let me just save everyone a lot of time and say that I'm opposed to
> this change, and that I believe that it would cause way too much
> disturbance to be accepted this close to beta.
>
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Oleg Broytmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > PEP: XXX
> > Title: str(container) should call str(item), not repr(item)
That's ok. A rejected PEP has its purpose, too. It will rest peacefully
in the archive, holding all arguments consolidated and will serve as a point
of reference.
Any objection if I demand it be properly registered, assigned a number
and then rejected?
PS. Am I the champion whose PEP has been killed before I even finished it? ;)
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
