On 5/29/08, Oleg Broytmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:31:17PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> ... I'm opposed to this change, and that I believe >> that it would cause way too much >> disturbance to be accepted this close to beta.
> That's ok. A rejected PEP has its purpose, too. Yes, but it might be better to defer instead. "Too close to beta" is a strong argument, but doesn't apply to 3.1 or 3.2 -- by which time the unicode-keyed dicts or oddly-converted print statements may change the importance. -jJ _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
