On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Oleg Broytmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:31:17PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> Let me just save everyone a lot of time and say that I'm opposed to >> this change, and that I believe that it would cause way too much >> disturbance to be accepted this close to beta. >> >> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Oleg Broytmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > PEP: XXX >> > Title: str(container) should call str(item), not repr(item) > > That's ok. A rejected PEP has its purpose, too. It will rest peacefully > in the archive, holding all arguments consolidated and will serve as a point > of reference. > Any objection if I demand it be properly registered, assigned a number > and then rejected?
I've added it for you. See r63794. > > PS. Am I the champion whose PEP has been killed before I even finished it? ;) Probably not. :) > > Oleg. > -- > Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN. > _______________________________________________ > Python-3000 mailing list > Python-3000@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/musiccomposition%40gmail.com > -- Cheers, Benjamin Peterson "There's no place like 127.0.0.1." _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
