On 20 January 2014 14:39, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 20 Jan 2014 08:06, "Victor Stinner" <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Is it enough to know the python process and how to write good patches? I >> don't see why Yury would become but not Vajrasky Kok. > > In this case, it's Yury's specific contributions to an orphan module and > being a co-author of an accepted PEP related to that module that motivate my > suggestion, rather than general bug fixing (which I agree would typically > involve a wider range of contributions). > > I see it as similar to the way we grant commit access to authors of "add a > module to the standard library" PEPs as a matter of course so they can > continue maintaining it.
Ping? Yury's someone I run *my* inspect module changes by, so it would definitely make my life easier if I could +1 his patches and he could take care of committing and pushing them himself. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
