On Wed, Jan 22, 2014, at 07:01 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 20 January 2014 14:39, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 20 Jan 2014 08:06, "Victor Stinner" <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is it enough to know the python process and how to write good patches? I
> >> don't see why Yury would become but not Vajrasky Kok.
> >
> > In this case, it's Yury's specific contributions to an orphan module and
> > being a co-author of an accepted PEP related to that module that motivate my
> > suggestion, rather than general bug fixing (which I agree would typically
> > involve a wider range of contributions).
> >
> > I see it as similar to the way we grant commit access to authors of "add a
> > module to the standard library" PEPs as a matter of course so they can
> > continue maintaining it.
> 
> Ping?
> 
> Yury's someone I run *my* inspect module changes by, so it would
> definitely make my life easier if I could +1 his patches and he could
> take care of committing and pushing them himself.

I don't see anyone complaining too loudly, so have him send his key to
hgaccou...@python.org.
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers

Reply via email to