On Wed, Jan 22, 2014, at 07:01 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 20 January 2014 14:39, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 20 Jan 2014 08:06, "Victor Stinner" <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Is it enough to know the python process and how to write good patches? I > >> don't see why Yury would become but not Vajrasky Kok. > > > > In this case, it's Yury's specific contributions to an orphan module and > > being a co-author of an accepted PEP related to that module that motivate my > > suggestion, rather than general bug fixing (which I agree would typically > > involve a wider range of contributions). > > > > I see it as similar to the way we grant commit access to authors of "add a > > module to the standard library" PEPs as a matter of course so they can > > continue maintaining it. > > Ping? > > Yury's someone I run *my* inspect module changes by, so it would > definitely make my life easier if I could +1 his patches and he could > take care of committing and pushing them himself.
I don't see anyone complaining too loudly, so have him send his key to hgaccou...@python.org. _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
