On Tue, 22 May 2018 at 13:10 Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:
> > Le 22/05/2018 à 22:06, Brett Cannon a écrit : > > > > > > On Tue, 22 May 2018 at 12:07 Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org > > <mailto:anto...@python.org>> wrote: > > > > > > Le 22/05/2018 à 20:58, Barry Warsaw a écrit : > > > > > >> Thoughts? (We can dogfood this proposal too, if there's interest. > :-) > > > > > > I don't know whether this will help focus rambling PEP > > discussions. I personally don't love the linearity of GH comments. > > Threading is useful! > > > > What has become of the Discourse experiment? > > > > > > A Discourse experiment was never started. If you mean Zulip it's still > > going at python.zulipchat.com <http://python.zulipchat.com>. > > I meant this, whatever it was: https://discuss.python.org/ :-) > Ah, that never went anywhere because it was just a short experiment that the overload-sig did. If people wanted to do a serious experiment with it then we can discuss it over on core-workflow. > > I don't think Zulip works for structured discussion. I also find it > slightly less usable than I expected. > Why specifically? Do you still find IRC more usable? Just trying to understand how Discourse would be different enough to solve the issue you're having. -Brett > > Regards > > Antoine. > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/