On Thu, 24 May 2018 at 10:45 Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:
> > Le 24/05/2018 à 18:54, Brett Cannon a écrit : > > > > I don't think Zulip works for structured discussion. I also find it > > slightly less usable than I expected. > > > > Why specifically? Do you still find IRC more usable? > > Um, no. But I find Zulip's way of grouping discussions by day *then* by > topic makes things a bit confusing and not very easy to follow. It > seems designed for people who log in every day. > Ah, you must be reading Zulip through "All Messages". I personally read each topic individually by pressing "n" to navigate through each topic with an unread message, otherwise I too lose too much context. > > > Just trying to > > understand how Discourse would be different enough to solve the issue > > you're having. > > Which issue exactly? Zulip is decent as a chat system. It wouldn't > really work for PEP discussions, IMO. That's why I asked about Discourse. > Fair enough. Would you want a PEPs section and then some naming convention per thread to denote which PEP a thread is about?
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/