On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]> wrote: > I think Pablo will be good core developer and agree with the description > given by Victor. But it seems that he still needs to learn something about > what changes are good for Python.
I agree with Serhiy. Count me -1 for now. I don't care about total number of commits to be honest. It's not so hard to get 50 PRs merged into master in a month or so. Writing high quality code is not the only requirement to become a core developer. IMO, being active on bugs.p.o [1] and reviewing pull requests on GitHub [2] are more important than writing code or documentation. --Berker [1] According to bpo, Pablo has been active in 38 issues: https://bugs.python.org/issue?%40search_text=&ignore=file%3Acontent&title=&%40columns=title&id=&%40columns=id&stage=&creation=&creator=&activity=&%40columns=activity&%40sort=activity&actor=&nosy=pablogsal&type=&components=&versions=&dependencies=&assignee=&keywords=&priority=&status=&%40columns=status&resolution=&nosy_count=&message_count=&%40group=&%40pagesize=50&%40startwith=0&%40sortdir=on&%40queryname=&%40old-queryname=&%40action=search [2] Looking at Pablo's GitHub profile (from October 2017 to June 2018) most of Pablo's review comments seems to be made in their own PRs. I've found two non-core developer PRs reviewed by Pablo: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/6984 and https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/6481 _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
