On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 at 16:11 Carol Willing <willi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 With Victor's mentoring (1 or 2 months), I believe that it is > reasonable to promote Pablo to a core developer either now or after 3 > months of coaching. > > I would also like to see Cheryl Sabella who has been very active on the > bug tracker to also be promoted to a core developer as well as Emily > Morehouse who has been at the Language Summit for several years. > In both cases I think we just need someone to start a separate thread asking to have them be promoted along with the usual promise to mentor them for a month or so. -Brett > > I'm happy to trust Victor's perspective as well as Pablo being respectful > of the merge process. > > FWIW, I also believe that triaging issues, writing documentation, and > contributing code are all valuable to the success of CPython. Without issue > triage and quality documentation being valued, the users and contributors > suffer a lack of information and efficiency as well as demotivating > potential developers. > > > On Jun 13, 2018, at 1:46 PM, Victor Stinner <vstin...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Pablo proved its steady involvment in Python for almost one year with > multiple significant contributions (new os functions). IMHO you are > pushing the bar too high. > > > > I think Pablo will be good core developer and agree with the > description given by Victor.But it seems that he still needs to learn > something about what changes are good for Python > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
