+1 With Victor's mentoring (1 or 2 months), I believe that it is reasonable to
promote Pablo to a core developer either now or after 3 months of coaching.
I would also like to see Cheryl Sabella who has been very active on the bug
tracker to also be promoted to a core developer as well as Emily Morehouse who
has been at the Language Summit for several years.
I'm happy to trust Victor's perspective as well as Pablo being respectful of
the merge process.
FWIW, I also believe that triaging issues, writing documentation, and
contributing code are all valuable to the success of CPython. Without issue
triage and quality documentation being valued, the users and contributors
suffer a lack of information and efficiency as well as demotivating potential
developers.
> On Jun 13, 2018, at 1:46 PM, Victor Stinner <vstin...@redhat.com
> <mailto:vstin...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Pablo proved its steady involvment in Python for almost one year with
> multiple significant contributions (new os functions). IMHO you are
> pushing the bar too high.
> I think Pablo will be good core developer and agree with the description
> given by Victor.But it seems that he still needs to learn something about
> what changes are good for Python
_______________________________________________
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
