> > Again, this was in the (poorly conveyed) context of getting email > addresses for them, or at least being able to contact them. >
I always thought there were already at least three places containing the necessary email addresses. * python-committers should be exactly this mailing list. * according to https://devguide.python.org/coredev/#issue-tracker it is mandatory for core developers to subscribe to the issue tracker which AFAIK requires a confirmed email address. * Every committer clearly must have signed the contributor agreement https://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ wich also contains a mandatory email field So why is it still necessary to get email addresses at all? 2018-08-02 10:59 GMT+02:00 Eric V. Smith <e...@trueblade.com>: > On 8/2/2018 3:32 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > >> On 02.08.2018 03:24, Eric V. Smith wrote: >> >>> On 8/1/2018 8:32 PM, Mariatta Wijaya wrote: >>> >>>> I think it would also be a good idea to include core developers >>>> of other Python implementations in such a document, in >>>> separate sections, e.g. for Jython, IronPython, PyPy, >>>> Stackless, etc >>>> >>>> >>>> Hmm, I don't think it is should be our (CPython) responsibility to >>>> keep track and maintain the list of the core devs of alternate Python >>>> implementations. Don't they have their own community / website? They >>>> have their own repo, bug tracker, governance model, and everything, >>>> right? >>>> >>> >>> Agreed. We have a hard enough time keeping track of our own core >>> developers. >>> >> >> I don't really think we have a hard time doing this. The only >> problem is that we never sat down and actually properly recorded >> this in one place. >> > > I was specifically thinking of a way to stay in touch with core devs, or > more specifically a way to send them email. In the past, before we moved to > github, I took it upon myself to find email addresses (current or not) for > all core devs, and I gave up without much success. > > I agree that we could probably come up with a list of names for people who > have been given the "core dev" status. > > For our core devs, can't we just say that the CPython core devs are >>> those with commit bits on the CPython repo? I realize that will >>> eliminate some people who have been core developers and never moved to >>> github, but if they bring it to our attention, we can add them easily >>> enough. >>> >> As discussed before, being a core developer is a status you >> gain and never lose. There is a clear difference between have >> commit rights to the (current) repo and this status. >> > > Agreed. Again, this was in the (poorly conveyed) context of getting email > addresses for them, or at least being able to contact them. > > Eric > > _______________________________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
