Le 23/10/2018 à 13:06, Nick Coghlan a écrit : > On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 06:38, Łukasz Langa <luk...@langa.pl> wrote: >> >> The voting procedure is described in PEP 8001. I flipped it from "Draft" to >> "Active" without further changes a few minutes ago. That's in the interest >> of giving everybody enough lead time as well as resolving the situation >> "well before PyCon 2019" as per Guido's and Carol's requests. >> >> Please read all the governance PEPs, ask for clarifications, voice all your >> concerns now. Ideally we will make all of the required changes to the PEPs >> early and not last minute before the vote. >> >> There were some suggestions on Discourse for changes to the selected model, >> the biggest being Stefan's suggestion to encrypt the votes and Donald's >> suggestion to use STAR instead of IRV for counting votes. We ended up not >> going with those suggestions. See Brett's comment here as to why: >> https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-8001-python-governance-voting-process/233/46 > > My main concern was about the potential for vote-splitting with > multiple "council" type proposals on the ballot, and IRV is enough to > address that (having been an Australian voter for ~22 years, I'm also > very familiar with it, and given the specific set of proposals we're > voting on, I don't think the case where STAR would give a different > answer is likely to come up - the various draft PEPs have too much in > common with either each other or the status quo for it to be likely > that a significant proportion of the folks voting will find any of > them completely unacceptable)
I had the same concern and I'm glad the voting mechanism addresses it. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
