My official vote is eventually -1 for 3.2.6, see the previous discussion for why I've changed my mind.
However I'm +1 on releasing 3.2.7 without a restrained testing period, not a long one like for 3.2.6. Regards, Nicolas 2006/2/2, Jim Gallacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I know you said no discussion Grisha, but can I have 2 ballots? ;) > > -1 If Graham thinks his conn handler fix is good, let's do 3.2.7 today. > > +1 If Graham is not sure, we release 3.2.6 now as is, and do a 3.2.7 > bugfix in the next 4 to 6 weeks after digging into _conn_read issue further. > > So, I guess that makes my official vote a +0. > > Over to you Graham. No pressure though. :) > > Jim > > (Dang, it makes me feel dirty to waffle on my first offical vote that way). > > Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: > > > > OK, I know we've had some votes on this before, but I'd like to put this > > in a separate thread where it's not intermixed with all kinds of other > > things. > > > > This is a vote for the core group. We can release the 3.2.6 tarball as > > is or fix the connection handler bugs (there are two of them - the > > buffer pointer and eagain condition Graham tracked down) and release a > > 3.2.7 (or 3.2.6.1). The rationale for disregarding those known issues is > > that the connection handler is hardly used by anyone. The rationale for > > NOT disregarding is that we claim this to be a stable release, and given > > our slow release cycle, I imagine 3.2.6 will be around for a while. > > > > Anyhow - *the core group* (you know who you are), if you think 3.2.6 > > should be released as is, send in your +1. > > > > Let's keep this thread strictly a vote, without it turning into a > > discussion (we can discuss things in other threads). > > > > My official vote is +0. > > > > (To see what this means read http://httpd.apache.org/dev/guidelines.html) > > > > Grisha > > > >
