Robert Brewer wrote: > I still prefer more methods, because my actual use-cases are more > complicated. Your solution would work for the specific case I gave, but > try factoring in: > > * A subclass which needs to share locals between begin and post, instead > of pre and post. > > or > > * A set of 10 subclasses which need the same begin() but different end() > code. > > Yielding seems both too restrictive and too inside-out to be readable, > IMO.
Ok, that makes sense. However, one of your examples seemingly pulls a name, 'old_children', out of nowhere. That's hard to fix. One of the greatest features of Python is the simple name scoping; we can't lose that. Shane _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
