[Steven Bethard] > So, just to make sure, if we had another PEP that contained from PEP 340[1]: > * Specification: the __next__() Method > * Specification: the next() Built-in Function > * Specification: a Change to the 'for' Loop > * Specification: the Extended 'continue' Statement > * the yield-expression part of Specification: Generator Exit Handling > would that cover all the pieces you're concerned about? > > I'd be willing to break these off into a separate PEP if people think > it's a good idea. I've seen very few complaints about any of these > pieces of the proposal. If possible, I'd like to see these things > approved now, so that the discussion could focus more directly on the > block-statement issues.
I don't think it's necessary to separate this out into a separate PEP; that just seems busy-work. I agree these parts are orthogonal and uncontroversial; a counter-PEP can suffice by stating that it's not countering those items nor repeating them. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
