[me] > > I don't think it's necessary to separate this out into a separate PEP; > > that just seems busy-work. I agree these parts are orthogonal and > > uncontroversial; a counter-PEP can suffice by stating that it's not > > countering those items nor repeating them.
[Raymond] > If someone volunteers to split it out for you, I think it would be > worthwhile. Right now, the PEP is hard to swallow in one bite. > Improving its digestibility would be a big help when the PEP is offered > up to the tender mercies to comp.lang.python. Well, I don't care so much about their tender mercies right now. I'm not even sure that if we reach agreement on python-dev there's any point in repeating the agony on c.l.py. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
