On 9/18/05, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Brett] > > Is anyone truly attached to nested tuple function parameters; ``def > > fxn((a,b)): print a,b``? > > I am. > > > > > ditching them thanks to the pain they caused in the AST branch. > > Changing the grammar for the convenience of a particular AST > implementation carries zero weight with me -- that is the tail wagging > the dog. > > Besides, I had thought that one of the goals of AST was to make it > easier to experiment with language. Are you finding that it has a hard > time even with the existing grammar? AFAICT, nested tuple arguments > presented no problem for Jython or PyPy. >
I obviously didn't make the statement clear enough. The suport is already in the AST branch, it was just a statement Jeremy made once while starting to work on the implementaiton for the AST branch that I happen to still remember. They are already supported. The real trigger for this is introspection issues in terms of function paramters. Without changing the way the bytecode does things the only way to know the exact parameters is to inspect the bytecode. There are possible solutions than removal, but I personally find the use of nested tuple arguments hard to read and not widely known as Guido pointed out in another email. > > > > Plus I don't think they are used very much (gut feeling, though, and > > not based on any grepping). > > python-dev grammar change proposals should probably be held to a higher > standard than "gut feeling, just toss it" whims. > Which is why I asked first before doing a full-blown push for this. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
