On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 1:28 AM Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> wrote: > > Hello, > > I finally managed to get some real-life benchmarks for why we need a > faster C calling protocol (see PEPs 576, 579, 580).
Good job. But I already +1 for adding support for extension callable type. Do you think this benchmark can be optimized more in future optimization which is possible by PEP 580, but not 576? > > I should mention that this was done on Python 2.7.15 (SageMath is not > yet ported to Python 3) but I see no reason why the conclusions > shouldn't be valid for newer Python versions. I used SageMath 8.3.rc1 > and Cython 0.28.4. Do you mean you backport LOAD_METHOD and fastcall to Python 2.7 for benchmarking? Reproducing it seems hard job to me... -- INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
