Given the cost of a mistake here I recommend a higher standard. But in the end it’s no longer my decision.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 11:18 AM Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> wrote: > On 2018-07-21 19:55, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > I don’t think we can safely assume Python 3.7 has the same performance, > > actually. A lot has changed. > > I'm not denying that some things have changed. Rather, I claim that > those changes wouldn't invalidate the benchmarks. > > I am comparing calls through tp_call (A) versus optimized call paths > (B). I only need to assume that the speed improvements to (A) between > 2.7 and 3.7 are not bigger than the speed improvements to (B). > > Most optimizations which have been done in Python 3.x target (B). In > fact, I'm not aware of any optimization to (A) apart from maybe some > minor code improvements. So I think it's a relatively safe assumption > that the speed difference between (A) and (B) did not decrease from 2.7 > to 3.7. > > > Jeroen. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido (mobile)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
