I don’t think we can safely assume Python 3.7 has the same performance, actually. A lot has changed.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:10 AM INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 1:28 AM Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I finally managed to get some real-life benchmarks for why we need a > > faster C calling protocol (see PEPs 576, 579, 580). > > Good job. But I already +1 for adding support for extension callable type. > Do you think this benchmark can be optimized more in future optimization > which is possible by PEP 580, but not 576? > > > > > I should mention that this was done on Python 2.7.15 (SageMath is not > > yet ported to Python 3) but I see no reason why the conclusions > > shouldn't be valid for newer Python versions. I used SageMath 8.3.rc1 > > and Cython 0.28.4. > > Do you mean you backport LOAD_METHOD and fastcall to Python 2.7 > for benchmarking? > Reproducing it seems hard job to me... > > -- > INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido (mobile)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
