El lun., 5 de ago. de 2019 a la(s) 01:25, <[email protected]> escribió: > > We should revisit what we want to do (if anything) about invalid escape > sequences. > > For Python 3.8, the DeprecationWarning was converted to a SyntaxWarning which > is visible by default. The intention is to make it a SyntaxError in Python > 3.9.
What about allowing in 3.8 to from __future__ import this SyntaxWarning (so anybody can start kicking own code's tires), then 3.9 could make it a real SyntaxWarning, and 4.0 (3.10?) make it a SyntaxError? Of course, in a year or so we could decide to delay the last two steps even more... Regards, -- . Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org.ar/ Twitter: @facundobatista _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/S62JZC6TSJHBGX4IDWF7XATDQ6HV2YVH/
