Hi, Le sam. 18 avr. 2020 à 19:16, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> a écrit : > Mostly, I hope that by making the > subinterpreters functionality available to pure Python programmers > (while it was formally an advanced and arcane part of the C API), we > will spur of bunch of interesting third-party experimentations, > including possibilities that we on python-dev have not thought about. > (...) > * I think the module should indeed be provisional. Experimentation may > discover warts that call for a change in the API or semantics. Let's > not prevent ourselves from fixing those issues.
Would it make sense to start by adding the module as a private "_subinterpreters" module but document it? The "_" prefix would be a reminder that "hey! it's experimental, there is a no backward compatibility warranty there". We can also add a big warning in the documentation. Victor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/MYRGBV7PIIXHA3V7JZMZCHYYPEKPRHF5/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
