On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 7:25 AM Victor Stinner <vstin...@python.org> wrote: > Would it make sense to start by adding the module as a private > "_subinterpreters" module but document it? The "_" prefix would be a > reminder that "hey! it's experimental, there is a no backward > compatibility warranty there".
I would expect a leading underscore to be confusing (as well as conflicting with the name of the low-level module). if we did anything then it would probably make more sense to name the module something like "interpreters_experimental". However, I'm not sure that offers that much benefit. > We can also add a big warning in the documentation. We will mark it "provisional" in the docs, which I expect will include info on what that means and why it is provisional. -eric _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/LB7ACPFAT3QU5YUPIFWH4NHB7YYVJXQG/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
