On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:57:49 +0100 Mark Shannon <m...@hotpy.org> wrote: > > An Anti-PEP is a way to ensure that those opposed to a PEP can be heard > and, if possible, have a coherent voice. > Hopefully, it would also make things a lot less stressful for PEP authors.
I don't think this really works. A PEP has to present a consistent view of the world, and works as a cohesive whole. Arguments against a PEP don't form a PEP in themselves, they don't need to be consistent with each other; they merely oppose a particular set of propositions. So an "anti-PEP" would not be anything like a PEP; it would just be a list of assorted arguments. Also, in the case of PEP 622, I haven't seen anyone argue against the PEP in general. Rather, against specific design decisions in the PEP. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/DJ4IHMF34F7VDOY7RWY6KMPNDQF2MPQE/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
