On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:48 AM Mark Shannon <m...@hotpy.org> wrote:
> ... > For those of you aware of the recent releases of Cinder and Pyston, > PEP 659 might look similar. > It is similar, but I believe PEP 659 offers better interpreter > performance and is more suitable to a collaborative, open-source > development model. > I was curious what you meant by "is more suitable to a collaborative, open-source development model," but I didn't see it elaborated on in the PEP. If this is indeed a selling point, it might be worth mentioning that and saying why. --Chris > As always, comments and suggestions are welcome. > > Cheers, > Mark. > > Links: > > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0659/ > https://github.com/facebookincubator/cinder > https://github.com/pyston/pyston > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/VKBV4X6ZEMRBALW7JNOZYI22KETR4F3R/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/NGDXMGDYQQSJO73WOPSQO7GM4OXDKI73/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
