Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> > I'm obviously missing something here.
>
> One thing that you are *obviously* missing (there might be more):
>
> Nobody has stepped forward and said "I make trac happen". Without
> somebody (specific) saying that, all technical arguments in favour
> of that software are futile.
I'm quite sure I've already pointed to
http://www.python-hosting.com/freetrac
which could be used by the Python 3000 activity in order to evaluate
Trac, and to
http://www.python-hosting.com/shared_hosting
plus a small fraction of the PSF budget for the Python code, if Trac is
found to be good enough, and provided that the PH folks think that it's
a good idea to host core development on their platform (I assume we
have pretty good stats for how svn.python.org is being used).
I can ask them for a test py3k account, if there's any interest.
</F>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
