> I'm a bit nervous about syncing, because I have the feeling that > python-dev is committing changes to python private branch of pybsddb. I > would rather prefer patches send to me and integrate "canonical" pybsddb > releases in Python frequently.
My understanding was that the pybsddb copy in Python *is* the official code base. I think it's unfortunate that the pybsddb project was revived, even though it was already dead. Perhaps we should remove bsddb from Python again, and refer people to pybsddb instead? > Somebody suggested to post patches in the tracker, but I think this is > not going to work. The diff from current python bsddb and the official > version is so huge that nobody could follow it. A more sensible > approach, I think, is to "diff" current python pybsddb against the > version I used as my root (January?), integrate the changes in current > "canonical" pybsddb and, then, drop the entire updated package into python. -1. Who is going to do the 3k porting? > I think this is the only way when integrating a project outside python > SVN. Suggestions?. The usual solution is to not integrate then, at all. Python doesn't really ship with any libraries that also have an active life outside of Python. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com