On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jesse Noller wrote: >> >> However, the flip side of this is that no one really "likes" the >> threading API as-is, so putting the module into the standard library >> with the matching API simply adds another "broken" API. > > Provided threading gets a PEP 8 style API in 2.6 (which it looks like it is > going to), then I don't see a problem with multiprocessing only providing > the new API. > > Cheers, > Nick. >
Fantastic. If no one has any other arguments to the contrary, I'll run with the new API naming scheme. Now I have a lot of tests and documentation to rewrite. -jesse _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
