I've accepted your PEP. I think it still needs some clean-up and perhaps clarification of the agreement reached about API style, but there is nothing now that keeps you from implementing it! Hopefully you'll make the beta release early next week.
--Guido On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jesse Noller wrote: >>> >>> However, the flip side of this is that no one really "likes" the >>> threading API as-is, so putting the module into the standard library >>> with the matching API simply adds another "broken" API. >> >> Provided threading gets a PEP 8 style API in 2.6 (which it looks like it is >> going to), then I don't see a problem with multiprocessing only providing >> the new API. >> >> Cheers, >> Nick. >> > > Fantastic. If no one has any other arguments to the contrary, I'll run > with the new API naming scheme. > > Now I have a lot of tests and documentation to rewrite. > > -jesse > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com