I'll have a cleaned version to you by end of day, and by day, I mean by 10:00 EST :)
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've accepted your PEP. I think it still needs some clean-up and > perhaps clarification of the agreement reached about API style, but > there is nothing now that keeps you from implementing it! Hopefully > you'll make the beta release early next week. > > --Guido > > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Jesse Noller wrote: >>>> >>>> However, the flip side of this is that no one really "likes" the >>>> threading API as-is, so putting the module into the standard library >>>> with the matching API simply adds another "broken" API. >>> >>> Provided threading gets a PEP 8 style API in 2.6 (which it looks like it is >>> going to), then I don't see a problem with multiprocessing only providing >>> the new API. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Nick. >>> >> >> Fantastic. If no one has any other arguments to the contrary, I'll run >> with the new API naming scheme. >> >> Now I have a lot of tests and documentation to rewrite. >> >> -jesse >> > > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) > _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
