On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> +1 on opting for properties in the specific cases here where it makes sense.
If you can get Guido to agree to it, I'll implement it. > > I'm +1 too... but which is the normal procedure here? > > Should it be... > > 2.n : .is_alive() > 2.n+1 : .is_alive() (deprecated), .alive (recommended) > 2.n+2 : .alive I think: 2.x isAlive() (Py3kWarning), .alive (recommended for compatibility with 3.x) 3.x .alive -- Cheers, Benjamin Peterson "There's no place like 127.0.0.1." _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
