Thomas Heller wrote: > Christian Heimes schrieb: >> Nick Coghlan schrieb: >>> Actually, I believe 3.0 already took a big step towards allowing this by >>> changing the way modules are initialised. >> You are believing correctly. Martin has designed and implemented a >> nicely working API to store extension module data per interpreter state. >> For now interpreter states are used for sub interpreters only. >> >> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3121/ > > But the extension modules still have to changed to use this mechanism, right?
Yep, but at least it's *possible* now. With 2.x, it isn't possible for an extension module to support subinterpreters properly, even if they want to. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
