Paul Moore schrieb: > OK, but how close is it to providing isolation for threads running > under the control of the GIL? I'm thinking of something along the > lines of an in-process version of fork(), which spawns a new > interpreter and runs the 2 interpreters as threads, still using the > GIL to enforce serialisation, but otherwise independent. I believe > that Perl uses this model for its "interpreter threads" > implementation.
How is your idea different from subinterpreters? Today you can have multiple subinterpreters inside a single process. Each subinterpreter has its own state and can see only its own objects. Christian _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
