2010/1/24 Floris Bruynooghe <floris.bruynoo...@gmail.com> > Introducing C++ is a big step, but I disagree that it means C++ should > be allowed in the other CPython code. C++ can be problematic on more > obscure platforms (certainly when static initialisers are used) and > being able to build a python without C++ (no JIT/LLVM) would be a huge > benefit, effectively having the option to build an old-style CPython > at compile time. (This is why I ased about --without-llvm being able > not to link with libstdc++). > > Regards > Floris
That's why I suggested the use of an external module, but if I have understood correctly ceval.c needs to be changed using C++ for some parts. If no C++ is required compiling the classic, non-jitted, CPython, my thought was wrong, of course. Cesare
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
