Hey Dirkjan, [Circling back to this part of the thread]
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <dirk...@ochtman.nl> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 21:14, Collin Winter <collinwin...@google.com> wrote: [snip] >> My quick take on Cython and Shedskin is that they are >> useful-but-limited workarounds for CPython's historically-poor >> performance. Shedskin, for example, does not support the entire Python >> language or standard library >> (http://shedskin.googlecode.com/files/shedskin-tutorial-0.3.html). > > Perfect, now put something like this in the PEP, please. ;) Done. The diff is at http://codereview.appspot.com/186247/diff2/5014:8003/7002. I listed Cython, Shedskin and a bunch of other alternatives to pure CPython. Some of that information is based on conversations I've had with the respective developers, and I'd appreciate corrections if I'm out of date. Thanks, Collin Winter _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
