On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 06:14:44PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Barry Warsaw <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > I suppose this is going to be very subjective, but in skimming the
> > thread it seems like most people like putting the byte code cache
> > artifacts in subdirectories (be they siblings or folder-per-folder).
>
> I don't understand the distinction you're making between those two
> options. Can you explain what you mean by each of “siblings” and
> “folder-per-folder”?
sibilings: the original proposal, i.e.:
foo.py
foo.pyr/
MAGIC1.pyc
MAGIC1.pyo
...
bar.py
bar.pyr/
MAGIC1.pyc
MAGIC1.pyo
...
folder-per-folder:
foo.py
bar.py
__pyr__/
foo.MAGIC1.pyc
foo.MAGIC1.pyo
foo.MAGIC2.pyc
bar.MAGIC1.pyc
...
IIUC
Personally I'm +1 on the folder-per-folder option.
Floris
--
Debian GNU/Linux -- The Power of Freedom
www.debian.org | www.gnu.org | www.kernel.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
