Mark Dickinson wrote: > Agreed on all points. Would it be terrible to simply add all relevant > tags the moment a PEP is accepted? E.g., if a PEP pronounces some > particular behaviour deprecated in Python 3.3 and removed in Python > 3.4, then corresponding release blockers for 3.3 and 3.4 could be > opened as part of implementing the PEP.
That strikes me as a really good idea, since the tracker already serves as a global "to do" list for the project (heck, I've used it as a semi-private to do list at times, when I've thought of things I need to fix when I don't have the roundtuits free to actually fix them). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
