On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 05:57, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mark Dickinson wrote: >> Agreed on all points. Would it be terrible to simply add all relevant >> tags the moment a PEP is accepted? E.g., if a PEP pronounces some >> particular behaviour deprecated in Python 3.3 and removed in Python >> 3.4, then corresponding release blockers for 3.3 and 3.4 could be >> opened as part of implementing the PEP. > > That strikes me as a really good idea, since the tracker already serves > as a global "to do" list for the project (heck, I've used it as a > semi-private to do list at times, when I've thought of things I need to > fix when I don't have the roundtuits free to actually fix them). >
And with all the proper dependency linkage it will make it obvious when the PEP is fully implemented. +1 from me. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
