On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 13:30, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 05:07, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
>>> Barry Warsaw <barry <at> python.org> writes:
>>>> Python 3 uses the .py file for __file__ but I'd like to see a transition to
>>>> __source__ for that, with __cache__ for the location of the PVM, JVM, LLVM 
>>>> or
>>>> whatever compilation cache artifact file.
>>> Well, I don't think we need another transition... Just keep __file__ for the
>>> source file, and add a __cache__ or __compiled__ attribute for the compiled
>>> file(s).
>>
>> So what happens when only bytecode is present? As of right now
>> __file__ is set to the path of the bytecode if no source exists
>> (needed for reloading along with backwards-compatibility). Would you
>> set __file__ = __compiled__?
>
> This is what I would propose. There are also shared libraries, so
> __file__ should really point to the file that is being executed. In the
> case of a source file, claiming that this is the one that gets executed
> is fairly accurate even if we had actually loaded the byte code from the
> cache.

I like that explanation that __file__ contains what is semantically
being run and using __compiled__ to simply represent what was actually
loaded.

> The only case when this may be wrong is when somebody sets the
> timestamp of the source file backwards, or the timestamp of the byte
> code file forwards. For this case, a second attribute could help (and I
> would set *that* to None if we only wrote the pyc file, but didn't read
> it - a library functions would be able to tell where the pyc file should
> have been written to).

Well, if you are mucking with file timestamps while loading code you
are just asking for trouble, so I don't think we need to worry about
it.

-Brett


>
>> Maybe, but only one of them will be used. Having to check for all of
>> the possible compiled versions of a module is just a waste of time;
>> you should only care about what import used to load the module.
>
> I agree.
>
> Martin
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to