On Sat, 22 May 2010 19:12:05 +1000, Brian Quinlan <br...@sweetapp.com> wrote: > On May 22, 2010, at 5:30 AM, Dj Gilcrease wrote: > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Brian Quinlan <br...@sweetapp.com> > > wrote: > >> Except that now isn't the time for that discussion. This PEP has > >> discussed > >> on-and-off for several months on both stdlib-sig and python-dev. > > > > I think any time till the PEP is accepted is a good time to discuss > > changes to the API > > I disagree. If a PEP is being updated continuously then there is > nothing stable to pronounce on.
Well, you've been making updates as a result of this round of discussion. If there is still discussion then perhaps the PEP isn't ready for pronouncement yet. At some point someone can decide it is all bikeshedding and ask for pronouncement on that basis, but I don't think it is appropriate to cut off discussion by saying "it's ready for pronouncement" unless you want increase the chances of its getting rejected. The usual way of doing this (at least so far as I have observed, which granted hasn't been too many cases) is to say something like "I think this PEP is ready for pronouncement" and then wait for feedback on that assertion or for the pronouncement. It's especially good if you can answer any concerns that are raised with "that was discussed already and we concluded X". Bonus points for finding a thread reference and adding it to the PEP :) -- R. David Murray www.bitdance.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
