Brian Quinlan wrote:
I think that the "Executor" suffix is a good indicator of the interface being provided.
It's not usually considered necessary for the name of a type to indicate its interface. We don't have 'listsequence' and 'dictmapping' for example. I think what bothers me most about these names is their longwindedness. Two parts to a name is okay, but three or more starts to sound pedantic. And for me, "Pool" is a more important piece of information than "Executor". The fact that it manages a pool is the main reason I'd use such a module rather than just spawning a thread myself for each task. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
