On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 04:26, Thomas Nagy <tnagyemail-m...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > Hello, > > I am looking forward to replacing a piece of code > (http://code.google.com/p/waf/source/browse/trunk/waflib/Runner.py#86) by the > futures module which was announced in python 3.2 beta. I am a bit stuck with > it, so I have a few questions about the futures: > > 1. Is the futures API frozen?
It will be once Python 3.2 final is released. -Brett > 2. How hard would it be to return the tasks processed in an output queue to > process/consume the results while they are returned? The code does not seem > to be very open for monkey patching. > 3. How hard would it be to add new tasks dynamically (after a task is > executed) and have the futures object never complete? > 4. Is there a performance evaluation of the futures code (execution overhead) > ? > > Thanks, > Thomas > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org > _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
