Re: [Python-Dev] readd u'' literal support in 3.3?

[Łukasz Langa]

Wiadomość napisana przez Chris McDonough w dniu 8 gru 2011, o godz. 06:08: It would make it possible to share code like this across py2 and py3:   a = u'foo' As Armin himself wrote, py3k-compatible code ported from 2.x is often very ugly. This kind of change would only deepen the problem. -1 Or:   from __future__ import unicode_literals   a = 'foo' I recognize that the last option is probably the way "its meant to be done" Yes, that's the reason 2.x has b''. If Python 2.8 ever came to be, making this __future__ work with the standard library would be the right way to do it. --  Pozdrawiam serdecznie, Łukasz Langa Senior Systems Architecture Engineer IT Infrastructure Department Grupa Allegro Sp. z o.o. Pomyśl o środowisku naturalnym zanim wydrukujesz tę wiadomość! Please consider the environment before printing out this e-mail.

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com