On Dec 9, 2011, at 12:43 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Even if it weren't slow, I still wouldn't use it to automatically > convert code at install time; a single codebase is easier to reason > about, and easier to support. Users send me tracebacks all the time; > having them match the source is a wonderful thing. > > Even though 2to3 was my idea, I am gradually beginning to appreciate this > approach. I skimmed the docs for "six" and liked it.
Actually, maybe I like it a bit better than I thought. The biggest issue for the single-codebase approach is 'except ... as ...'. Peppering one's codebase with calls to sys.exc_info() can be a real performance problem, especially on PyPy. Not to mention how ugly it is. For some reason I thought that this syntax was only supported by 2.7 and up; I see now that it's 2.6 and up. This is still a problem for 2.5 support, of course, but 2.6-only may not be too far away for many projects; Twisted's support schedule for Python versions typically follows Ubuntu's, which means that we might be able to drop 2.5 as early as 2013! :). Even in the plans that involve 2to3 though, "drop everything prior to 2.6" was always supposed to be step 0, so "single codebase" adds much less of a burden than I thought. -glyph
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
