> > FWIW, I agree that much of the rhetoric in the current version of PEP > 414 is excessive. > > Armin has given me permission to create an updated version of PEP 414 > and toning down the hyperbole (or removing it entirely in cases where > it's irrelevant to the final decision) is one of the things that I > will be changing. I also plan to add a link to Lennart's guide to the > various porting strategies that are currently available, more clearly > articulate the cases where the new approach can most help (i.e. when > there are project specific reasons to avoid the unicode_literals > import), as well as name drop Pyramid (Chris McDonough), Flask > (Armin), Django (Jacob Kaplan-Moss) and requests (Kenneth Reitz) as > cases where key developers of web-related third party frameworks or > libraries have indicated that PEP 414 will help greatly with bringing > the sections of the Python ecosystem they're involved with into the > Python 3 fold over the next few years. > > My aim is for the end result to better reflect the reasons why Guido > *accepted* the PEP, moreso than Armin's own reasons for *wanting* it. > Thank you Nick and Armin. I think toning down the rhetoric is a very amicable solution. Let me know if I need to add anything to http://getpython3.com/ (have linked porting guides there too if you want)
jesse _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
