On 3/29/2012 3:50 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 17:45, Benjamin Peterson<[email protected]> wrote:
> 2012/3/29 Brian Curtin<[email protected]>:
>> After talking with Martin and several others during the language
>> summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't
>> remember who, but some suggested it should just be a regular old
>> feature instead of going through the PEP process. So...does this even
>> need to continue the PEP process?
>
> If you have a PEP and it's accepted, what would be the difference?
In the end? Nothing. It was a comment about this whole process not
even needing to exist.
It was pretty controversial when it started... but it is such obviously
beneficial functionality... and works well...
All it needs is official acceptance now, and integration into the
release, no?
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
