On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Brian Curtin <br...@python.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 17:45, Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> wrote: >> 2012/3/29 Brian Curtin <br...@python.org>: >>> After talking with Martin and several others during the language >>> summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't >>> remember who, but some suggested it should just be a regular old >>> feature instead of going through the PEP process. So...does this even >>> need to continue the PEP process? >> >> If you have a PEP and it's accepted, what would be the difference? > > In the end? Nothing. It was a comment about this whole process not > even needing to exist.
Hindsight, as usual, is 20-20. If the process got enough discussion that somebody said, "look, this really needs a PEP," it's worth the effort to record it. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
